President William Ruto has defended his recent critique of the Judiciary, asserting that judicial impunity is unacceptable in Kenya. The President faced criticism after expressing his intention to disregard court orders issued by what he referred to as ‘corrupt judges.’
In response to Chief Justice Martha Koome and Opposition leader Raila Odinga’s remarks that defying the rule of law could lead to anarchy, President Ruto, through a statement from State House, emphasized that corruption should not hide behind the shield of judicial independence. He stated that exposing and holding accountable those engaging in corrupt practices is a duty to prevent the obstruction of the people’s hopes and aspirations.
The President, a believer in the Constitution, emphasized the imperative to lead by example in defending constitutional values and shielding citizens from judicial misconduct fueled by corruption and vested interests.
President Ruto criticized the Law Society of Kenya, asserting that it has no mandate to advise him on constitutional matters and the independence of the Judiciary. He maintained that countering the influence of vested interests and corrupt judicial officials is essential for Kenya’s progress.
Highlighting the historical challenges posed by corruption and vested interests hindering national development, President Ruto saw the current moment as an opportunity for the country to break free from the chains of impunity and realize transformation mandated by the people and legislated by Parliament.
Opposition leader Raila Odinga urged the government to respect the rule of law and cautioned against interference with the Judiciary. Odinga accused President Ruto of attempting to hijack the Judiciary by intimidating judges and magistrates handling cases against his policies.
Chief Justice Martha Koome also warned against threats to disobey court orders, emphasizing that such actions compromise the rule of law and set the stage for anarchy. She called upon judges to ensure the enforcement of court orders and the unwavering upholding of judicial authority.
